<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:02:25 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blog</title><link>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Tom Friedman: "I could get elected on a carbon tax"</title><dc:creator>Leslie Carlson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:54:53 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2010/1/26/tom-friedman-i-could-get-elected-on-a-carbon-tax.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">169106:1604002:6438158</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Here's a thought-provoking short <a href="http://www.planetforward.org/video/tom-friedman-takes-your">interview</a> with the <em>New York Times</em>' Tom Friedman, on why the green revolution is the only way to save the U.S. economy, how to protect human rights, why military totalitarianism might go green first and on how oil made him famous.</p>
<p>Smart guy, interesting--and perhaps prophetic--words.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-6438158.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Tackling behavior change with science</title><dc:creator>Leslie Carlson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:12:34 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2010/1/20/tackling-behavior-change-with-science.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">169106:1604002:6382083</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.grist.org/article/2010-01-12-never-mind-what-people-believe-how-can-we-change-what-they-do">Q &amp; A with Dr. Robert Cialdini</a> in Grist (one of my favorite publications) really has me thinking about how to frame language so that it leads to behavior change. I think I'm going to order the good doctor's book, right now.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-6382083.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Some corporations get serious. Is it enough?</title><dc:creator>Leslie Carlson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:57:24 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2009/10/6/some-corporations-get-serious-is-it-enough.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">169106:1604002:5414555</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I have been following the climate change-related defections from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce with some surprise, and even a bit of hope. I never thought I would see major U.S. corporations agreeing with efforts to regulate and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but I appear to be seeing it now. Pigs have flown.</p>
<p>Today, <a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/news/ci_13492186?nclick_check=1">Apple became the fourth company </a>(last week, Oregon-based <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2009/09/nike_leaves_us_chamber_of_comm.html">Nike left the Chamber's board</a>, but remains a member) to leave the Chamber over the group's policy of denying climate change and fighting all efforts to reduce greenhouse gases.</p>
<p>It's too soon to call this a "revolt," but I think that the wind may have shifted a bit, and it's definitely no longer blowing at the Chamber's back. We'll see what the next few weeks bring, and how this impacts the <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2454">Waxman-Markey</a> discussions on Capitol Hill.</p>
<p>Count this development a hopeful sign in a dark time.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-5414555.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>On leaving the PR people at home...</title><dc:creator>Leslie Carlson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:51:21 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2009/7/29/on-leaving-the-pr-people-at-home.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">169106:1604002:4778599</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely with t<a href="http://www.grist.org/article/2009-07-23-the-eternal-durability-of-greenwash">his viewpoint</a> about admitting your past bad deeds, and pledging to move on. I've often given clients with the same advice, but like bad boyfriends, there are some who <strong>never</strong> want to have to say, "I'm sorry."</p>
<p>Those that do often find that they are able to move more quickly to success, but still, it's awful hard for companies--particularly the biggest--to 'fess up to greenwashing.</p>
<p>I would like to argue, however, that there are many PR people (present company included) that counsel the benefits of truth-telling and sincere apologies. Don't leave us all at home.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-4778599.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The last frontier of green: cosmetics</title><dc:creator>Leslie Carlson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2009/6/8/the-last-frontier-of-green-cosmetics.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">169106:1604002:4228619</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>There are two consumer product categories that I notice lagging behind in terms of sustainability. One is footwear. The other are beauty products.</p>
<p>Many shoe companies are trying to green up their processes and products, and I expect that in the future this will accelerate now that the <a href="http://www.nau.com/">sportswear industry</a> has become more sustainable. Cosmetic companies are also making the first, tentative steps towards sustainability, but too often these steps come in the form of "green" brands instead of changing their core business.</p>
<p>Aveda is one cosmetic company that appears to be going for <a href="http://aveda.aveda.com/about/press/c2c.asp">sustainability</a> in a big way, both in terms of operations and products. Here's a <a href="http://www.greenbiz.com/podcast/2009/05/12/aveda-paradigm-shift-cosmetics">great interview </a>with the President of Aveda, Dominique Conseil, about what they are doing.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-4228619.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>An interview about greenwashing</title><dc:creator>Leslie Carlson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:46:32 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2009/4/2/an-interview-about-greenwashing.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">169106:1604002:3540255</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Today I had the opportunity to talk "green" PR and the sins of greenwashing with PR guru Lee Weinstein on <a href="http://www.smallplateradio.com/003/">Small Plate Radio</a>. It's always to a joy to talk with someone who's so good at what they do.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-3540255.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Bonuses for cutting CO2</title><category>Business practice change</category><dc:creator>Leslie Carlson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:07:18 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2008/12/11/bonuses-for-cutting-co2.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">169106:1604002:2683342</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Corporate America--or at least a part of corporate America--has begun linking executive bonuses to CO2 emission goals, <a href="http://www.climatebiz.com/feature/2008/12/11/executive-bonuses-those-who-make-co2-cut">Greenbiz reports</a> today.</p>
<p>Instead of basing bonuses strictly on share earnings, companies like Xcel Energy base a quarter of their bonuses on how well staff help them cut emissions. And they're not just doing this for good publicity--greenhouse gas emissions and cuts are increasingly being viewed by investors as a "risk" as well as an "opportunity."</p>
<p>What's more, reducing carbon just might equate to making more money, rather than less, according to Neil Braun, CEO of the <a href="http://www.carbonneutral.com/">CarbonNeutral Company</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Our clients report substantial economic savings achieved by putting a real cost of carbon on the P/L (profit/loss) and assigning specific reduction targets to line management.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-2683342.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Making money while fighting climate change</title><category>Climate change</category><dc:creator>Leslie Carlson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:13:12 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2008/10/13/making-money-while-fighting-climate-change.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">169106:1604002:2420879</guid><description><![CDATA[<P><A href="www.climatebiz.com">ClimateBiz</A> has an <A href="http://greenbiz.com/news/2008/10/13/companies-tackling-climate-change-top-300b">interesting story</A> on their site today about the new "sector" of the economy that has formed to fight climate change. HSBC has even created an <A href="http://www.hsbcnet.com/solutions/news/corporate/cc_bmark.html">index</A> for this sector of the economy, and last year, it outperformed the biotech and software sectors combined--an amazing feat, in my opinion.</P>
<P>Most interesting to me, however, is the quote from an HSBC director: </P>
<P>
<blockquote>Climate&nbsp;change&nbsp;is no longer an environmental and social issue, but a huge economic global opportunity.<br></blockquote><br>While I disagree with the first part of this quote--one only has to comtemplate the current state of New Orleans to realize that climate change remains a huge social issue--I do agree that the economic benefits to investing in greentech/cleantech are big, and growing. The economic upside of creating a low-carbon economy is not widely accepted--yet--but I'm glad to see an investment bank interested in the economic change this country so badly needs.</P>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-2420879.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Thinking outside the u-no-what</title><category>Business practice change</category><dc:creator>Leslie Carlson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:24:40 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2008/9/10/thinking-outside-the-u-no-what.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">169106:1604002:2255118</guid><description><![CDATA[<P>Sorry, I couldn't help myself--I'm a victim of bad puns. But how's this for a shift from conventional thinking about packaging:</P>
<P style="LINE-HEIGHT: 12pt"><strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">Don't Shoot the Messenger</span></strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"><br></span><strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #666666; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">New HP laptop packaged in messenger bag instead of box</span></strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"> <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></span></P>
<P style="LINE-HEIGHT: 12pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">Don't take Grandma to <A href="http://lists.grist.org/t?r=2&amp;c=3632&amp;l=21&amp;ctl=30F1A:19CF056EFBE15DCBF406373B8B2B7B99"><span style="COLOR: #336699">Wal-Mart</span></A>: the big-box store's new Hewlett-Packard laptop "will be displayed on shelves wearing only the HP Protect Messenger Bag." Scandalous! But actually, there's no need to avert your eyes: the HP Pavilion dv6929 is served up in a recycled, reusable messenger bag instead of a box, cutting cardboard and plastic packaging by 97 percent. Thinking outside the box helped HP win Wal-Mart's Home Entertainment Design Challenge, which judged suppliers' products on attractive design, environmental innovation, and less-wasteful, less-toxic packaging. Wal-Mart says 25 percent less truck space is now needed to schlep the computer to stores, cutting transportation costs by 31 percent. In addition, purchasers of the $798 laptop, which is available only at Wal-Mart and Sam's Club, can recycle an old PC for free. <o:p></o:p></span></P>
<P>Hat tip to <A href="www.grist.org">Grist</A>, one of the liveliest, best-written publications about sustainability in the world. Seriously.</P>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-2255118.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Now that energy is a priority...</title><dc:creator>Leslie Carlson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:48:22 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2008/9/1/now-that-energy-is-a-priority.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">169106:1604002:2209079</guid><description><![CDATA[<P>The Democratic Convention last week was the first time I can remember (my childhood memories of the 70s being fairly hazy) that energy became a "top five" political priority. </P>
<P>Even when they were talking about national security, the Democrats in Denver mentioned energy as key to safety at home.&nbsp; They directly linked our foreign policy to our energy policy--and talked about the drastic consequences that oil addiction has to our pocketbooks and our ballooning budget deficit. This is not just about drilling, said many on the dais, but about building a&nbsp;<A href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/newenergy">comprehensive energy plan</A> that reduces our use of foreign oil, promotes renewable resources and makes us the market leader for new technology and green jobs.</P>
<P>It will be tough for the Republicans to top that, and given Hurricane Gustav, I expect we'll hear little about a comprehensive energy policy from them, outside of offshore drilling and maybe promotion of&nbsp; nuclear energy.&nbsp;The Republicans seem content to propose a few&nbsp;magic energy bullets (offshore drilling, nuclear) rather than raise the level of discussion about a <A href="http://www.scitizen.com/screens/blogPage/viewBlog/sw_viewBlog.php?idTheme=14&amp;idContribution=321">diverse energy mix</A>,&nbsp;which most experts believe is best. </P>
<P>The next few weeks of the campaign, however, I expect energy to be a much-talked-about topic. I sincerely hope Americans are listening and thinking critically about life in the decades to come, and not just worrying&nbsp;about the price of gas tomorrow.</P>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-2209079.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>