<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 29 May 2012 04:09:38 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Blog</title><subtitle>Blog</subtitle><id>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/atom.xml"/><updated>2012-03-01T18:26:26Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Talking about sustainability even when it's hard</title><id>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2012/3/1/talking-about-sustainability-even-when-its-hard.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2012/3/1/talking-about-sustainability-even-when-its-hard.html"/><author><name>Leslie Carlson</name></author><published>2012-03-01T17:49:36Z</published><updated>2012-03-01T17:49:36Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"></span><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 100px;" src="http://www.carlson-communications.com/storage/is_climate_change_a_problem.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1330626381229" alt="" /></span></span>It's difficult these days to talk about green issues without polarizing members of your audience, or even turning them off. Environmental organizations and sustainable businesses have been struggling of late to get their points of view across. Those of us on the communications end of things realize that what we have been doing isn't working so well. Something has to be done.</p>
<p>That's the bad news. The good news is that recent research and analysis gives us some suggestions on how to communicate better: reach out to people where they live, where they work and through people they know. We were fortunate to get to parse some of this research <a href="http://www.oregonmetro.gov/index.cfm/go/by.web/id/32823/print/true">through our work with Metro</a>, the Portland regional government, and it's been invaluable to our later work with all kinds of clients.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.iap2usa.org/category/chapters/cascade/">We're glad to share what we've learned</a>. That's because polarization helps no one, and dialogue and understanding everyone That's ultimately our goal: communications that lead to greater understanding, and ultimately forward progress.</p>
<p>Onward &amp; upward.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Tom Friedman: "I could get elected on a carbon tax"</title><id>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2010/1/26/tom-friedman-i-could-get-elected-on-a-carbon-tax.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2010/1/26/tom-friedman-i-could-get-elected-on-a-carbon-tax.html"/><author><name>Leslie Carlson</name></author><published>2010-01-26T21:54:53Z</published><updated>2010-01-26T21:54:53Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Here's a thought-provoking short <a href="http://www.planetforward.org/video/tom-friedman-takes-your">interview</a> with the <em>New York Times</em>' Tom Friedman, on why the green revolution is the only way to save the U.S. economy, how to protect human rights, why military totalitarianism might go green first and on how oil made him famous.</p>
<p>Smart guy, interesting--and perhaps prophetic--words.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Tackling behavior change with science</title><id>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2010/1/20/tackling-behavior-change-with-science.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2010/1/20/tackling-behavior-change-with-science.html"/><author><name>Leslie Carlson</name></author><published>2010-01-20T20:12:34Z</published><updated>2010-01-20T20:12:34Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.grist.org/article/2010-01-12-never-mind-what-people-believe-how-can-we-change-what-they-do">Q &amp; A with Dr. Robert Cialdini</a> in Grist (one of my favorite publications) really has me thinking about how to frame language so that it leads to behavior change. I think I'm going to order the good doctor's book, right now.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Some corporations get serious. Is it enough?</title><id>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2009/10/6/some-corporations-get-serious-is-it-enough.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2009/10/6/some-corporations-get-serious-is-it-enough.html"/><author><name>Leslie Carlson</name></author><published>2009-10-06T16:57:24Z</published><updated>2009-10-06T16:57:24Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I have been following the climate change-related defections from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce with some surprise, and even a bit of hope. I never thought I would see major U.S. corporations agreeing with efforts to regulate and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but I appear to be seeing it now. Pigs have flown.</p>
<p>Today, <a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/news/ci_13492186?nclick_check=1">Apple became the fourth company </a>(last week, Oregon-based <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2009/09/nike_leaves_us_chamber_of_comm.html">Nike left the Chamber's board</a>, but remains a member) to leave the Chamber over the group's policy of denying climate change and fighting all efforts to reduce greenhouse gases.</p>
<p>It's too soon to call this a "revolt," but I think that the wind may have shifted a bit, and it's definitely no longer blowing at the Chamber's back. We'll see what the next few weeks bring, and how this impacts the <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2454">Waxman-Markey</a> discussions on Capitol Hill.</p>
<p>Count this development a hopeful sign in a dark time.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>On leaving the PR people at home...</title><id>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2009/7/29/on-leaving-the-pr-people-at-home.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2009/7/29/on-leaving-the-pr-people-at-home.html"/><author><name>Leslie Carlson</name></author><published>2009-07-29T17:51:21Z</published><updated>2009-07-29T17:51:21Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely with t<a href="http://www.grist.org/article/2009-07-23-the-eternal-durability-of-greenwash">his viewpoint</a> about admitting your past bad deeds, and pledging to move on. I've often given clients with the same advice, but like bad boyfriends, there are some who <strong>never</strong> want to have to say, "I'm sorry."</p>
<p>Those that do often find that they are able to move more quickly to success, but still, it's awful hard for companies--particularly the biggest--to 'fess up to greenwashing.</p>
<p>I would like to argue, however, that there are many PR people (present company included) that counsel the benefits of truth-telling and sincere apologies. Don't leave us all at home.&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>The last frontier of green: cosmetics</title><id>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2009/6/8/the-last-frontier-of-green-cosmetics.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2009/6/8/the-last-frontier-of-green-cosmetics.html"/><author><name>Leslie Carlson</name></author><published>2009-06-08T19:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-08T19:00:00Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>There are two consumer product categories that I notice lagging behind in terms of sustainability. One is footwear. The other are beauty products.</p>
<p>Many shoe companies are trying to green up their processes and products, and I expect that in the future this will accelerate now that the <a href="http://www.nau.com/">sportswear industry</a> has become more sustainable. Cosmetic companies are also making the first, tentative steps towards sustainability, but too often these steps come in the form of "green" brands instead of changing their core business.</p>
<p>Aveda is one cosmetic company that appears to be going for <a href="http://aveda.aveda.com/about/press/c2c.asp">sustainability</a> in a big way, both in terms of operations and products. Here's a <a href="http://www.greenbiz.com/podcast/2009/05/12/aveda-paradigm-shift-cosmetics">great interview </a>with the President of Aveda, Dominique Conseil, about what they are doing.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>An interview about greenwashing</title><id>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2009/4/2/an-interview-about-greenwashing.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2009/4/2/an-interview-about-greenwashing.html"/><author><name>Leslie Carlson</name></author><published>2009-04-02T18:46:32Z</published><updated>2009-04-02T18:46:32Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Today I had the opportunity to talk "green" PR and the sins of greenwashing with PR guru Lee Weinstein on <a href="http://www.smallplateradio.com/003/">Small Plate Radio</a>. It's always to a joy to talk with someone who's so good at what they do.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Bonuses for cutting CO2</title><category term="Business practice change"/><id>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2008/12/11/bonuses-for-cutting-co2.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2008/12/11/bonuses-for-cutting-co2.html"/><author><name>Leslie Carlson</name></author><published>2008-12-11T19:07:18Z</published><updated>2008-12-11T19:07:18Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Corporate America--or at least a part of corporate America--has begun linking executive bonuses to CO2 emission goals, <a href="http://www.climatebiz.com/feature/2008/12/11/executive-bonuses-those-who-make-co2-cut">Greenbiz reports</a> today.</p>
<p>Instead of basing bonuses strictly on share earnings, companies like Xcel Energy base a quarter of their bonuses on how well staff help them cut emissions. And they're not just doing this for good publicity--greenhouse gas emissions and cuts are increasingly being viewed by investors as a "risk" as well as an "opportunity."</p>
<p>What's more, reducing carbon just might equate to making more money, rather than less, according to Neil Braun, CEO of the <a href="http://www.carbonneutral.com/">CarbonNeutral Company</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Our clients report substantial economic savings achieved by putting a real cost of carbon on the P/L (profit/loss) and assigning specific reduction targets to line management.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Making money while fighting climate change</title><category term="Climate change"/><id>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2008/10/13/making-money-while-fighting-climate-change.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2008/10/13/making-money-while-fighting-climate-change.html"/><author><name>Leslie Carlson</name></author><published>2008-10-13T17:13:12Z</published><updated>2008-10-13T17:13:12Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<P><A href="www.climatebiz.com">ClimateBiz</A> has an <A href="http://greenbiz.com/news/2008/10/13/companies-tackling-climate-change-top-300b">interesting story</A> on their site today about the new "sector" of the economy that has formed to fight climate change. HSBC has even created an <A href="http://www.hsbcnet.com/solutions/news/corporate/cc_bmark.html">index</A> for this sector of the economy, and last year, it outperformed the biotech and software sectors combined--an amazing feat, in my opinion.</P>
<P>Most interesting to me, however, is the quote from an HSBC director: </P>
<P>
<blockquote>Climate&nbsp;change&nbsp;is no longer an environmental and social issue, but a huge economic global opportunity.<br></blockquote><br>While I disagree with the first part of this quote--one only has to comtemplate the current state of New Orleans to realize that climate change remains a huge social issue--I do agree that the economic benefits to investing in greentech/cleantech are big, and growing. The economic upside of creating a low-carbon economy is not widely accepted--yet--but I'm glad to see an investment bank interested in the economic change this country so badly needs.</P>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Thinking outside the u-no-what</title><category term="Business practice change"/><id>http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2008/9/10/thinking-outside-the-u-no-what.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.carlson-communications.com/blog/2008/9/10/thinking-outside-the-u-no-what.html"/><author><name>Leslie Carlson</name></author><published>2008-09-10T16:24:40Z</published><updated>2008-09-10T16:24:40Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<P>Sorry, I couldn't help myself--I'm a victim of bad puns. But how's this for a shift from conventional thinking about packaging:</P>
<P style="LINE-HEIGHT: 12pt"><strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">Don't Shoot the Messenger</span></strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"><br></span><strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #666666; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">New HP laptop packaged in messenger bag instead of box</span></strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"> <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></span></P>
<P style="LINE-HEIGHT: 12pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">Don't take Grandma to <A href="http://lists.grist.org/t?r=2&amp;c=3632&amp;l=21&amp;ctl=30F1A:19CF056EFBE15DCBF406373B8B2B7B99"><span style="COLOR: #336699">Wal-Mart</span></A>: the big-box store's new Hewlett-Packard laptop "will be displayed on shelves wearing only the HP Protect Messenger Bag." Scandalous! But actually, there's no need to avert your eyes: the HP Pavilion dv6929 is served up in a recycled, reusable messenger bag instead of a box, cutting cardboard and plastic packaging by 97 percent. Thinking outside the box helped HP win Wal-Mart's Home Entertainment Design Challenge, which judged suppliers' products on attractive design, environmental innovation, and less-wasteful, less-toxic packaging. Wal-Mart says 25 percent less truck space is now needed to schlep the computer to stores, cutting transportation costs by 31 percent. In addition, purchasers of the $798 laptop, which is available only at Wal-Mart and Sam's Club, can recycle an old PC for free. <o:p></o:p></span></P>
<P>Hat tip to <A href="www.grist.org">Grist</A>, one of the liveliest, best-written publications about sustainability in the world. Seriously.</P>]]></content></entry></feed>
